User talk:Davey2010: Difference between revisions

...

Archives • 2011 • 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018 • 2019 • 2020 • 2021 Notes Recent Changes

DL exif software - blur faces at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Migrants in Hungary 2015 Aug 018.jpg. D –Davey2010^Talk 21:57, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	Merry Christmas Davey2010
	Hi Davey2010, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and healthy New Year, Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia, Lotje (talk) 05:47, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		* Happy Holidays 2021/2022, Davey2010! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:39, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	Merry Christmas and new year, Davey2010
	Hi Davey2010, Have a sweet and a safe Christmas and New Year holidays. Wishing you a colorful Christmas season. , --Contributers2020Talk to me here 10:14, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Contributers2020, Thank you so much for your lovely greeting, Best greeting I've seen this year, Truly a lovely greeting thank you - I hope you and yours are having a wonderful Christmas and I hope you all have a happy, healthy and safe New Year, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 12:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dave, Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year (hopefully without the Corona mess)! --Túrelio (talk) 13:40, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @mate and Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you too - One can only hope mate, I miss the old world desperately so, Lets hope 2022 will be a much better year for all of us!, Have a wonderful day mate and I hope you have a happy, healthy and safe New Year, All the best, Warm Regards, Dave // –Davey2010^Talk 13:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Davey2010, hope you're having a great day.

Fitindia has promoted me to file mover. So I moved 2 unidentified images. As you are a file mover as well, I would request you to confirm if I did it correct as I don't want anything to go wrong. I would be very grateful if you did it so. --Contributers2020^{Talk to me here} 17:25, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Contributers2020, All looks good here :), Have a great day, Thanks –Davey2010^Talk 17:35, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ словѣньскъ / ⰔⰎⰑⰂⰡⰐⰠⰔⰍⰟ ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ 日本語 ∙ македонски ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ slovenščina ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

---

   This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Commons.

–Lechita talk 19:12, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I am asking you to stop vandalizing - you undo the edits on the map without having the slightest idea what it contains, when the version showing the land in all its glory has been loaded, because the previous version was trimmed badly. Secondly, let go of the aggressive tone, because I will ask for an intervention and you will get a blockade - but you. My past? It's clean compared to yours, so worry about yours too. Lechita talk 19:12, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LechitaPL Good luck with that. The only disruptive person here is you. Pack it in or you'll find yourself blocked. –Davey2010^Talk 12:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Davey2010 I see you haven't finished your aggressive rhetoric + you are restoring the wrong version of the map. I gave you a warning, but as a destructive person with 7 locks on your account, you want to get the eighth lock. Lechita talk 14:29, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LechitaPL, I don't know anything about the history behind the map so you may well be correct however given your unnesseccary croppings with previous files IMHO you should seek consensus for your changes or failing that crop the file and upload as a whole new file. Report me and see where you get. –Davey2010^Talk 14:42, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Davey2010 & @LechitaPL - ok guys. Keep it calm please. Nothing happened, no one is vandalising, assume some good faith, will you, please? :) @Davey - LechitaPL admitted that he'd wrongly reverted some crops and he fully understands the situation. @LechitaPL - Davey was also acting in a good faith while reverting you. "Correcting" the crop by overwriting it with another one (even if the latter is correct indeed) is not the way how we do it. If you think that the crop is wrong, you should make a new crop from the original file, upload it separately, and use it in articles; while labeling the "wrong" crop with for example {{Factual accuracy}} or {{Inaccurate-map-disputed}}. @Davey - threatning another user with a block while having no means to apply one... you know, is just silly :) Try to avoid this. @Lechita - while I have no idea whether Lubusz diocese should be included in "Lands given up to Silesian dukes", please see above on correcting crops. Maybe the original file wasn't supposed to show this diocese, as it hadn't been given up to Silesian dukes? The best would be to consult the original uploader. Anyway guys, no sweats here please, take it easy, try to talk next time. And I assume that you will clean up whatever needs to be cleaned up, ok? cheers and have fun! Masur (talk) 13:50, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Masur for your helpful reply. –Davey2010^Talk 14:00, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:DemonFM New Logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

mattbr 06:55, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

"prev images were absolutely fine", do you know the different image qualities (Valued images, Quality images, Featured images)? my modifications are not only on the quality of the images but on a general update. you cancel everything without distinction without any respect for the work provided. please erase only true errors or vandalism but not a total cancellation.

thank you in advance — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 92.169.217.15 (talk) 14:20, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Apologies for the delayed response, You ask that question on the presumption that I knew you were replacing images based on quality!, In all of your edits (here, here and here) you left no edit summaries, Unfortunately I nor my colleagues are mind readers so if you don't explain what you're doing then how are we supposed to know what you're doing?

Back on topic IMHO the images are all fine and didn't need replacing - Just because the images have been voted VI, QI and FI doesn't mean we should start using them although of course we should always use high quality images but IMHO we shouldn't unnecessarily replace high quality images for the sake of it, You're more than welcome to head to the talkpage and seek consensus on your proposed images (IE in the form of a COM:RFC, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 17:50, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings: We have a newish volunteer who seems to have a problem when I pull images out of "no source, no license & no permission", mark them something like "This seems to be old enough to keep" and nominate them for deletion. He doesn't seem to wish to understand that this is a method to save the files and he gets rude to me about what he calls my lack of understanding of copyright and Commons. Recently he's started modifying his user page to include lists of negative interactions with me and other users. On one DN, someone commented that this user has trouble with en:wiki ^[1] & ^[2] and perhaps others. I would like to go on record that this situation now is creepy and unwelcome. I have no idea why he's picking at me, nor why he doesn't seem to understand that admins & bureaucrats (like me and Eugene Zelenko whom he also disrespects) work really hard keeping the place tidy and that there is no reason for personal attacks as part of the process. The situation is not fun and I would appreciate some help with it. Thank you. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:30, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ellin Beltz, Other than this DR I see no issues with RAN or their edits thus far - In the mentioned DR RAN should've helped rather than left pointless commentary and expected everyone to do the work for him - If you knew the needed information quite rightly you would've added that information instead of nominating it for deletion so the commentary/point scoring was unnesscerry but other than that I'm not seeing any issues.

Just to add I agree with your deletion here (because it's not a notable club nor do any cats exist for it),

Anyway it may be best going to AN and seeking guidance from an admin as far as my knowledge with RAN goes I only know or at least remember him from the TRM (The Rambling Man days, Sorry I couldn't be of any help, thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 18:35, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Heya: The one you pointed out is typical of the others. I will take your advice. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya, Ah okay admittedly i've only checked 4 recent DRs from the editor interaction tool and of course not following you both or being here that often there may be things I'm completely missed here, Thanks, Take care, –Davey2010^Talk 18:42, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Davey. My laptop got accidentally damaged several days ago and is under repair. I'm here asking you to move File:Molana Ahmed Saeed Dehlvi.png to File:Ahmad Saeed Dehlavi calligraphy.png. This is the consistency that the DCW User Group manages with all the calligraphic images that come under its focus. Regards, ─ The Aafī on Mobile ^(talk) 16:59, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please be sure that you don't leave any redirect behind. ─ The Aafī on Mobile ^(talk) 17:34, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @AafiOnMobile, Hope you're well, Ah sorry to hear that - I've gone ahead and moved the file for you :), Many thanks, Kind Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 17:55, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wont reping you but just wanted to say many thanks for adding the reflist talk to the talkpage, I remembered it but then got sidetracked so it never got done so thanks again for your help too :), Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 17:59, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. Thanks for the move. I don't know how it happened but the display of the laptop is completely gone. As it was brand new laptop; this accidental damage has caused a lot of grief. Thanks to the CIS-A2K who are helping with the repair costs. ─ The Aafī on Mobile ^(talk) 19:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @AafiOnMobile, Just spotted your note inre to redirect so I've requested deletion of that,

Wow that sucks!, Unfortunately they don't make things like they used too, My expensive Dell Inspiron is made of cheap flimsy plastic so everythings come away or broken on it! but having no display must be terrible

Oh that's nice of them - i don't ever get laptops repaired - I just buy second hand cheap ones lol, Anyway fingers crossed your laptop can be fixed and is workable again Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 01:35, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm back to my routine work. I hope everything is going good with you. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 05:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @TheAafi, okay cool, yep all's good here thanks - hope all's okay with you and yours, Kind regards, –Davey2010^Talk 18:35, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by BLOODSWEAT&CHLORINE closed as keep - add the keep template from the first DR - Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jeremy Reingold Rugby Player in Players Tunnel Newlands Rugby Stadium with wife ( Carina Marx ).jpg‎ –Davey2010^Talk 19:44, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Optare Solo (original) - Optare Solo - Optare Versa - Sort images

Hi, So at present we have these categories:

• Category:Arriva Guildford & West Surrey
• Category:Arriva Kent & Sussex‎
• Category:Arriva Kent Thameside‎
• Category:Arriva Medway Towns‎
• Category:Arriva Southend‎

So to cut a long and confusing post short - Arriva at some point between 2015-2018 dropped the above divison names from their depots, vehicles and websites. Legal lettering (such as here (under 2nd window at the very bottom) had been replaced with "Ariva Kent and Surrey" - Arriva in the whole of Kent (inc Medway), Guildford, Surrey and Sussex are all under "Arriva Kent and Surrey" and have been for years so should the formet names be amended so to imply their historical and then create categories such as "ArrivaKS Medway, Arriva KS Maidstone? ( –Davey2010^Talk 21:12, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• File:Bus img 2520 (16179588895).jpg
• –Davey2010^Talk 14:57, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Davey, if you want help in identification of bus models, this revert ist not helpful. Files in this category should not be in either category (Enviro200 oder Enviro300) as long as they have not been identified as such. Being categorized in both makes even less sense, since each image is certainly wrong in one of these categories. Thus, I'd like to ask you to refrain from premature reverts like this one. Thank you, MB-one (talk) 18:29, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @MB-one, The Enviro category you added is is going once I'm done with that category, The addition of Enviro200 and Enviro300 makes sense as the vehicles within that cat are either 200 or 300 models..... obviously they cannot be both but given I didn't know what that category was called at the time of creating it I made do with what I remembered and knew (ie the Category:Alexander Dennis Enviro200 and Category:Alexander Dennis Enviro300 models). Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 18:38, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I - [1] II -double headlights III - single front headlight V - upgraded front

do research first –Davey2010^Talk 19:00, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Davey2010/Setra2 - +x in the UK subcats
Category:Davey2010/VanHool - sort
Category:Davey2010/VanHool2 - +x in the UK subcats
Category:Davey2010/IrizarCentury2
Category:Davey2010/IrizarPB2
Category:Davey2010/Mercedes
Category:Davey2010/Berkof
File:S602VAY MAN 24-400 - Noge Catalan, Rayleigh Roadways Ltd, Wickford. - Flickr - sludgegulper.jpg- +in the uk

create subcat –Davey2010^Talk 17:06, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Category:Transbus Paragon - create Transbus R420

File:Acorn Coach & Bus (Tamworth Bus & Coach) coach (NIL 7252), 17 April 2013.jpg- add comment in re https://www.flickr.com/photos/dean_dave/8665819892/#comment72157646228703104 –Davey2010^Talk 21:58, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dochertys Midland Coaches coach (SP06 FBG) 2006 Mercedes-Benz 815D (Vario) Sitcar, Auchterarder depot, 1 May 2011.jpg >> File:Classic Coaches mini coach Mercedes Benz in Strangford, County Down 19 June 2008.jpg –Davey2010^Talk 13:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Davey2010/Irizar
Category:Davey2010/Levante
Category:Davey2010/Bova
Category:Davey2010/Jonckheere

File:Cheltenham Festival advert, 2017 (33333039931).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Category:Davey2010/Irizar - created
• Category:Davey2010/Levante - created
• Category:Davey2010/Bova - movde all images to Bova
• Category:Davey2010/Jonckheere
• Category:Davey2010/VanHool
• Category:Davey2010/Berkof
• Category:Davey2010/Plaxton
• Category:Davey2010/
• Category:Davey2010/
• Category:Davey2010/
• Category:Davey2010/
• Category:Davey2010/
• Category:Davey2010/
• Category:Davey2010/
• Category:Davey2010/
• Category:Davey2010/
• Category:Davey2010/
• Category:Davey2010/
• Category:Davey2010/

File:Tributes To the Manchester Bomb Victims (34943917861).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wacom (34670932580).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Naughty Pikachu (34214735584).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Davey2010/Buses –Davey2010^Talk 15:44, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:No Fear Here - Manchester Street Art (34265987623).jpg

Yours sincerely, Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:34, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please explain the revert? [2] Rudolph Buch (talk) 23:51, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Rudolph Buch, My sincere apologies - I was mass-reverting an IP on my watchlist and unfortunately reverted you without obviously realising, I've undone my revert, My apologies again for this, Many thanks, Warm regards, –Davey2010^Talk 23:54, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries and thanks for the quick reaction. Rudolph Buch (talk) 23:56, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, Many thanks for letting me know, Thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 00:03, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Davey2010! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:41, 22 December 2022 (UTC)   [reply]

Many thanks George for your lovely greeting, I hope you and yours have a lovely Christmas and a very Happy and healthy New Year, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 21:53, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Davey2010, looking at this image you categorized, I was wondering if the Category:Files from epSos.de Flickr stream would be a logical category to add it to. Thank you for your time. :-) Lotje (talk) 11:50, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Lotje, I don't ever add Flickr categories to images but I've added that category, Have a very Merry Christmas and a Healthy and Happy New Year, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 17:44, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays, Davey2010! Hello Davey2010, have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! It has been a pleasure to have you as a fellow Wikimedian this year. Wherever you are, enjoy the festive season and stay warm (if you're north of the Tropic of Cancer)! Your help in maintaining, improving and expanding Wikimedia Commons will always be appreciated. Greetings from Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. --SHB2000 on 12:55, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks SHB2000 for your lovely greeting, I hope you and yours have a lovely Christmas and a very Happy and healthy New Year, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 20:01, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Mass rollback on rather dubious grounds. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

~~ Alex Noble/1-2/TRB 15:32, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Alex Noble Sad sad individual. –Davey2010^Talk 18:31, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was stupid and immature of me to pour gasoline on the fire by lashing out at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Benlisquare but you are also at fault for both making a rude, passive-aggressive remark to begin with (“I'm sorry what ? ..... Something being "pretty amazing" doesn't automatically mean it's in fucking scope. But hey we'll debunk my out-of-scope and potential copyright concerns as "nonsensical".”) and escalating the situation even further. I have collapsed the offending section and don’t want to continue this pointless flamewar. Please try to maintain some decorum in the future. Dronebogus (talk) 21:27, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]