User talk:Muboshgu: Difference between revisions

2,392

1

13

1

1

71

1

570

121

This is Muboshgu's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57Auto-archiving period: 14 days

Things I can do to help WikiProject U.S. Congressedit list Ongoing: Upload [please add links to the senate rules for each of these committees.] Ongoing: Upload new district maps and incorporate them into articles (November 19, 2013) Ongoing: Apply {{US Congress party summary}} on all Congresses (February 20, 2018) Ongoing: Create edit notices for all articles. (February 15, 2010)

I'm sorry I missed the deadline on the Hack Wilson GA status because I'm on vacation and had no time to log on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orsoni (talk • contribs) 00:10, May 16, 2012

AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

• Walter N Iwachiw, RN SPNP SFNP,Businessman, CUNY/Concorde University of Law Educated, Owner of WNIS Companies (Telecom, Telemedicine, Assisted Living, Nursing/Hospital Facilities, Oil/Gas Exploration, Computers/Software/Hardware/Programing, Internet, Power/Internet Infrastructure, Personal/Computer Security, Residential/Commercial/Manufacturing Development, Solar/Fuel Cell/Nuclear Power Generation, Space Business Enterprises, Contract vendor to NYC Brd of Education, Contract Vendor to NYS BOCES). First Responder to WTC injured, Common Law Wife Roxanne RN also first responder but deceased from injuries, Step sister in Common Law Diane of NYS Dept. of Taxation WTC Deceased. World Network International Services Inc awarded 496 Million WTC URIR Grant for fiber restoral and installation below Canal St. World Network International Services Inc. initial awardee of MTA Cellular WIFI RFP, Hudson Yards High Bidder, Port Authority 2001 WTC 99 year lease high bidder, and MTA bidder for commuter wifi, http://www.nyccfb.info/candidates/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autobiography_of_Walter_N_Iwachiw http://www.iwachiw4mayor.net/ ^[1][2][3][4]

just bring up the nyc campaign finance page and search for candidates...don't participate in censorsip by partisan actors help free elections...

The Senate confirmed "Sarah Jewell" of Washington to be Interior Secretary: http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/floor_activity/floor_activity.htm http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/B?r113:@FIELD(FLD003+d)+@FIELD(DDATE+20130410) http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=1&vote=00094

AutomaticStrikeout  ?  is wishing you a Happy Memorial Day! On this day, we recognize our fellow countrymen who have fought our nation's battles for the past several hundred years, protecting our freedom and safety. We remember those who paid the ultimate price and we support those who continue to willingly sacrifice their safety for the sake of their country. Happy Memorial Day!

Share this message by adding {{subst:Memorial Day}} to a fellow American's talk page.

User:Sportsguy17/Happy Holidays 2013

Sorry I forgot the source :P thank you for reverting but I have reverted back to my versions with the sources

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Todd Takayoshi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd Takayoshi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Thank you very much for your help and attention to this matter.

Wikiblanks- Ray

I just want to tell u I'm awesomeday2015 and I have a big question for u the things that I have edited about mlb things are true I would just like to now why u keep changing it back to the original leave a message response below

On 8 February 2015, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Dean Smith, which you recently nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

I've never seen a NOMINEE with that political box on the right, or whatever you want to call it. At first glance, it looks like she was an elected representative. Only people who win the primary election have that, never seen it otherwise. Just found it misleading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.224.154.125 (talk) 23:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes are helpful for summarizing key points for a subject. Plenty of nominees have them. See Robert Sarvis, Randy Altschuler, Danny Tarkanian, E. W. Jackson for just a few examples. Everyone should have one. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Infoboxes for more information. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:32, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No don't get me wrong, I'm just fine with personal infoboxes. I'm talking about how she also has a box for "democrat nominee" on top of that. I haven't seen that with anyone else, including the people you linked to with the exception of Robert Sarvis. Those are the only two. Again, that's only ever reserved for people who are elected in the general election. Maybe you got confused because I also deleted her personal infobox in addition to her political nominee box, I shouldn't have done that.68.224.154.125 (talk) 08:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)68.224.154.125 (talk) 08:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 October 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article David Stearns, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that David Stearns is the youngest general manager in Major League Baseball at 30 years of age? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/David Stearns. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 13:43, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You just left a waning for this editor. I just un-did an edit of theirs at Jake Arrieta. I usually check recent contributions for this kind of malicious edit and sure enough all his edit are about changing atheletes teams to one from Pittsburgh. Not sure how to proceed. Buster Seven Talk 17:20, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If the behavior is continuing, I'd say WP:AIV. Those edits are vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just took a look. It's the only edit made since the Cervelli one yesterday. Last warning was level 3, so I gave level 4, which is the last warning before reporting to AIV. We could report the user at any time for being a vandalism-only account, none of their edits have been constructive. Thanks for reverting the edit. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:49, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Muboshgu,

All of the data points I posted on the Thurman Munson page are available on his BaseballReference.com page, including his postseason gamelog. The Johnny Bench comparison points are similarly available on his BaseballReference.com page. I will figure out how to link these citations to the page.

Christopherlhahn (talk) 19:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not all of your data is on B Ref. That thing about the baseball card, for instance, read like an unsourced opinion. For more information on how to cite sources, please read Wikipedia:Citing sources and Help:Footnotes. Feel free to ask me any specific questions you might have. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 October 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Speaker of the United States House of Representatives election, October 2015, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that according to members of the United States House of Representatives, the October 2015 election to succeed John Boehner as Speaker of the House has turned the body into a "banana republic"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Speaker of the United States House of Representatives election, October 2015. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:2004 World Series.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the project baseball invite, have accepted! JoshDonaldson20 (talk) 04:40, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Always feel free to discuss any issues. Happy editing! – Muboshgu (talk) 04:48, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Look up the dictionary definition of the word "effect," and compare the other usage of the word in the U.S. Constitution. What is so difficult about this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by VEChicago (talk • contribs) 19:37, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We don't engage in original research and need reliable sources for all content. You're providing your own synthesis for possible point of view-pushing. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:40, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To camouflage the sort of thuggery I have run up against by suggesting I am "pushing a point of view" is indicative that you yourself(-ves) are doing that very thing, by peremptorily excising my commentary without consultation or discussion. I only received automated notice after the deed was done.

This is an issue that has not been litigated; ergo, it is not possible to cite an external source. But one is not necessary in this case. Former Congressman Barr misunderstood the use of the noun "effect" in Article IV. We don't need a court decision to explain that any more clearly. This contention is proved by consulting any dictionary as well as the Constitution itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VEChicago (talk • contribs) 19:52, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you're contending that Barr misinterpreted the word "effect", surely you can find a source that backs up your claim. Otherwise, we have only your word that this is the "correct" interpretation of the Constitution, something which lawyers can determine should be interpreted in numerous ways on numerous issues. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:56, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That is an utterly risible statement in light of the Obergefell v. Hodges ruling from this past April, which included the directive that all U.S. states must henceforth recognize the marriages of same-sex persons equally across all states. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VEChicago (talk • contribs) 16:00, October 30, 2015

Obviously you're new here and not up on how all of this works. For instance, we try to stay civil with each other; saying that my comment is "utterly risible" is not a good way to work together.

Please read these guides on getting started:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

– Muboshgu (talk) 20:11, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would submit that being thusly thin-skinned is at the root of the problem. The statement was indeed risible, as it suggests you completely neglected to factor in the relevant Supreme Court case. While the Court did not expressly address Barr's use (or misuse) of the word "effect," the decision answers the question for us with its directive, which cites the "Full Faith and Credit" clause as its basis. The idea of a different interpretation of "effect" was hatched by Barr himself and was thereby proven baseless. ** VEChicago (talk) 20:23, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you think the people who edit Wikipedia are constitutional scholars, I'm sorry to disappoint you. But again, we need verification for anything that goes on Wikipedia. You'd get further if you sought some, rather than trying to take shots at someone you don't know. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:30, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And the thinly-veiled accusation with which you began this exchange, that I was "pushing" a point of view (and by extension, therefore, submitting suspect material) was certainly not a taking a "shot," was it. ** VEChicago (talk) 20:36, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I said "possibly", because I still don't know if you are or not. Provide some sources for this interpretation. Noted constitutional scholars will surely have them out there which can verify what you're saying, and in which case it can stay up. Or if it's from Obergefell, clarify where in the decision it says this. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, good grief.... I just stated it did not come directly from Obergefell minutes ago in a prior paragraph, but it was dealt with indirectly. Barr was not a party to the suit, and there would have been no need for the Court to have ruled on his contention directly. Furthermore, Barr's idea was so off-base and bespoke such an amateurish misunderstanding of Article IV that it might even have been viewed as an affront to the Court for any of the parties to the suit to have brought it up. If you want to find the source of "pushing a point of view" in this issue, I would suggest you look to those who cling, more than a decade later, to this fanciful meme hatched by Barr. It was and is an attempt to cast aspersions on the Supreme Court's reasoning and authority. ** VEChicago (talk) 21:04, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, it's on you to provide sources for changes you want to make. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Japan Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Akira Nakamura (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One of my self-appointed weekly tasks is handing out the Editor of the Week for the Editor Retention Project WP:WER. Today's recipient is User Spanneraol. If I could have I would have given a dozen awards to all you Baseball editors. Your project's diligence and monitoring keep the wheels on the tracks for so many articles. Buster Seven Talk 13:26, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spanneraol is deserving an award like that. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:25, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are currently 6,885,716 articles on Wikipedia.

for all your contributions, thank you.

Smallbones_(smalltalk) 13:31, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've requested arbitration enforcement related to the Huma Abedin editor with an axe to grind. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 06:35, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]