Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/03/05

Unused personal picture. Watermark makes it useless for any article. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:10, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It is a duplicate of File:Tiz zaqyah (5709239974).jpg. It is however not useless - see File:Tiz zaqyah (5709239974) - crop.jpg. MGA73 (talk) 08:21, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All other images uploaded by User talk:JenniferStrelnik were blatant copyright violations with the same claim of ownership. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:29, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Denniss Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:55, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed and not used, like {{Wikipedia}} (and {{Wikipedia category}} = {{Wiki cat}} = {{Wikicat}}).
Template {{W}} is the better version. sarang사랑 07:11, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you before replace it in Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Wpd pages? --Dereckson (talk) 10:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One last replacement done; now it is only mentioned in old talk page entries. sarang사랑 07:32, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you also replace it in the user talk archives too?

As you want to delete it as unused, it's our responsibility to make sure it's really unused before to delete it, including in .../Archives page (they're especially made to keep old talk page entries, it's their goal!). --Dereckson (talk) 09:17, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. The remaining links are from the delete request itself. sarang사랑 10:42, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Dereckson (talk) 17:25, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This template isn't used anymore. Dereckson (talk) 17:26, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

experimental use Reporterarun86 (talk) 19:38, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: user requst, also out of scope Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:24, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted photo lifted from: http://shawnwellingphotos.smugmug.com/00-00-00Events/Shawn-Welling-Profile-Pics/i-BQqmsBk/0/L/01-14-09-Shawn-Todd-grin-L.jpg ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 23:08, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:23, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The White House Historical Society is not a branch of the Federal government, the license does not apply. Pieter Kuiper (talk) 00:36, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The relevant copyright is explained at http://www.whha.org/whha_about/about_rights-reproductions.html. Unless the uploader wants to explain more about the source for this small image, then the precautionary principle applies. --Fæ (talk) 08:48, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio as per http://www.whha.org/whha_about/about_rights-reproductions.html Captain-tucker (talk) 11:55, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio? Also appears here. Uploader's user name is similar to the copyright holder's name. Stefan4 (talk) 00:44, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 11:58, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that seems to be out of project scope. Is your music known to many people yet? Saibo (Δ) 01:32, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 11:59, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused JPEG image, replaced by SVG file. There is no source or author of this file. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 02:06, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, author Captain-tucker (talk) 12:07, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:09, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 18:20, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:12, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 18:22, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:13, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep This looks like Vissarion, see http://album.vissarion.eu/en/Album%202.html, surprised its not used as Vissarion has no photo. --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:30, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok, that's a reason to keep. I will add the picture to the article. Ices2Csharp (talk) 21:43, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Сомнительно авторство загрузившего. Вот тут есть фотография большего разрешения, там указан в качетстве автора Валерий Бекешин. прямая ссылка — Redboston 14:30, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete seems to be ripped from vissarion.ru, photo credited to Valery Bekeshin --moogsi^(blah) 15:24, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Author of the photo is stated as unknown. This means copyright issue. PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:24, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Own Work Captain-tucker (talk) 22:52, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Author of the photo is stated as unknown. This means copyright issue. PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:25, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Own Work Captain-tucker (talk) 22:52, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Author of the photo is stated as unknown. This means copyright issue. PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:26, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Я уже объяснял этому номинатору в предыдущей номинации, почему на моих фотографиях на Викискладе первое время было такое оформление (я хотел указать, что не знаю авторов постройки). Показываемая здесь неосведомлённость - не иначе как троллинг. Сейчас эта дореволюционная церковь уже до конца отреставрировали - неплохо бы загрузить новые фотографии, но и причин удаления этих (также 2, 3) не вижу.--Бериллий (talk) 08:00, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Вам надо 1) извиниться, 2) исправить.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 09:33, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Вы можете использовать {{Own photo}} чтобы указать что вы не автор здания, а именно фотографии. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 12:51, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
•  Keep All three of them. They were taken with the same camera and "own work" implies the uploader. -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 20:20, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
•  Keep per Herby Laitr Keiows (talk) 03:25, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Own Work Captain-tucker (talk) 22:52, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:A close-up of Pit3.JPG (i didnt list all the images as i should have) Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:52, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: near exact duplicate George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:30, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:A close-up of Pit3.JPG (i didnt list all the images as i should have) Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:54, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: near exact duplicate George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:30, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:A close-up of Pit3.JPG (i didnt list all the images as i should have) Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:55, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: near exact duplicate George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1. per Commons:Deletion requests/File:A close-up of Pit3.JPG (i didnt list all the images as i should have) Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:55, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
2. 10 images are there. More or less, they are all same.To fullfil the project scope, File:A close-up of Pit11.JPG is more descriptive than others. Kindly consider to keep this file and delete 9 other files. --Tha-uzhavan (talk) 17:24, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:47, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:A close-up of Pit3.JPG (i didnt list all the images as i should have) Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:55, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: near exact duplicate George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:A close-up of Pit3.JPG (i didnt list all the images as i should have) Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:07, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: near exact duplicate George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:A close-up of Pit3.JPG (i didnt list all the images as i should have) Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:08, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: near exact duplicate George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:40, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:A close-up of Pit3.JPG (i didnt list all the images as i should have) Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:09, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: near exact duplicate George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:42, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:A close-up of Pit3.JPG (i didnt list all the images as i should have) Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:09, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: near exact duplicate George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:43, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

bad quality logo (?) for unknown whatever. no educational use possible Hedwig in Washington ^(MAIL?) 07:47, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:48, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:11, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:50, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Userpic1.jpg

User got blocked on hewiki and I strongly doubt own work on this image. Hedwig in Washington ^(MAIL?) 01:22, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. The blocking plus lack of metadata convinces me it is not the user's work. Wizardman 19:25, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: questionable source, movie still or promotional image --Denniss (talk) 23:52, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unidentified individual, no educational value, out of scope. Also description indicates this is intended to attack or offend the subject of the photo. QU ^TalkQu 10:40, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:51, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:54, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:27, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:59, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reasons for deletion request - Out of scope as unused image of non-notable band, and possibly copyrighted. Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:30, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:00, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

derivative work of (maybe) copyrighted image Bulwersator (talk) 18:30, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete Original photo was taken in 1951, so I'd say it's still in copyright. The original is owned by the National Portrait Gallery.[1] Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:48, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Fastily Morning Sunshine (talk) 12:01, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Source: Facebook / Can't find the image an facebook, so I call it a copy vio of an album cover Hedwig in Washington ^(MAIL?) 18:45, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio Morning Sunshine (talk) 12:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader inactive, discussion is done, image is not used. Very specific topic, no reuse, no educational use possible Hedwig in Washington ^(MAIL?) 18:59, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:55, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage deleted on eswiki (misuse of userpage), image is not used anywhere and has no educational value whatsoever Hedwig in Washington ^(MAIL?) 19:03, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:55, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

unknown band performing in a gymnasium. couldn't find the band on the net, probably a garage band(?) Hedwig in Washington ^(MAIL?) 19:07, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:56, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio http://www.panneau-solaire.me/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/lidl1.jpg // out of scope McZusatz (talk) 20:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: likely an attack image Morning Sunshine (talk) 12:02, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

fan art, no educational use possible. Hedwig in Washington ^(MAIL?) 21:00, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:00, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Listed source is probably not Author. Exif shows "Ingo Dumreicher Fotografie" as author who can be found at http://http://www.id-fotos.de/

NB: What is "deletion requests subpage" ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (127.0.0.1) (talk • contribs) 18:08, 6 March 2012‎ (UTC)[reply]

This! -- RE rillke questions? 19:09, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Obviously not own work (per EXIF data) and without permission. Túrelio (talk) 08:23, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is this free? Beyoncetan (talk) 11:23, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Magazine cover, fair use Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:19, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded in a batch of copyvios claimed as own work, but I don't have a specific source. Highly likely to also be a copyvio IMO. 99of9 (talk) 12:20, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Probable copyvio as the nomination and some deleted uploads by user Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:22, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded in a batch of copyvios claimed as own work, but I don't have a specific source. Highly likely to also be a copyvio IMO. 99of9 (talk) 12:21, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Probable copyvio as the nomination and some deleted uploads by user Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:22, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded in a batch of copyvios claimed as own work, but I don't have a specific source. Highly likely to also be a copyvio IMO. 99of9 (talk) 12:21, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Probable copyvio as the nomination and some deleted uploads by user Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:22, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded in a batch of copyvios claimed as own work, but I don't have a specific source. Highly likely to also be a copyvio IMO. 99of9 (talk) 12:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Probable copyvio as the nomination and some deleted uploads by user Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:22, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted to gcda. Kiran Gopi (talk) 12:17, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - Delete per nom. --Sreejith K (talk) 13:09, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can we keep a low resolution version to use in the page Greater Cochin Development Authority. Consider this before deleting --Ranjithsiji (talk) 16:43, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: {{Non-free logo}} Sreejith K (talk) 08:36, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work, containing copyrighted text. Kiran Gopi (talk) 12:16, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:46, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work, not de-minimis. Kiran Gopi (talk) 12:11, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose {{PD-Ineligible}} also The picture is not only includes the poster, it also has the bamboo pole, and a plant infront of this. This banner has kept for the publicity of Ponkala Festival in the Attukal Temple; ie, a public place. --Vaikoovery (talk) 09:25, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:45, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No permission.

• File:Подвиг.jpg
• File:Иное.jpg
• File:Сборник статей.jpg
• File:Откровение.jpg
• File:ПУТЬ.jpg
• File:Повесть притча для тех, кто обрёл надежду..jpg
• File:Н.Т..jpg
• File:Ангелы приходят Всегда..jpg
• File:Начальник тишины..jpg
• File:Охранительство..jpg
• File:Святорусское откровение миру..jpg
• File:Путь Святых Отцов..jpg

Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:25, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:45, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious {{PD-because}}. The sources provided for all images are the websites of IMT campuses and none of them released the images to the public domain.

• File:IMT Nagpur Main Block Side.jpg
• File:IMT Nagpur Main Block Right Side.jpg
• File:IMT Nagpur Main Block.jpg
• File:IMT Nagpur Hostel Block.jpg
• File:IMT Nagpur Front Gate.jpg
• File:IMT Nagpur Academic Block.jpg
• File:IMT Ghaziabad Library.JPG
• File:IMT Ghaziabad Hostel.jpg
• File:IMT Ghaziabad Amphitheatre.jpg
• File:IMT Ghaziabad Academic Block.jpg
• File:IMT Dubai Night.jpg
• File:IMT Dubai Day.jpg

Muhandes (talk) 10:58, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:44, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope, no permission.

• File:Strength-of-Materials.pdf
• File:Fluid-Mechanics-Notes-2.pdf
• File:Fluid-Mechanics-Lecture-Notes-I.pdf
• File:07A70101-GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-II-2.pdf
• File:07A70401-REMOTESENSINGANDGISAPPLICATIONS-2.pdf
• File:07A70103-ENVIRONMENTALENGINEERING-II -2.pdf
• File:07A70106-TRAFFICENGINEERING-2.pdf
• File:07A70102-FINITE ELEMENTS METHODS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING.pdf
• File:07A70101-GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-II.pdf
• File:07A70401-REMOTESENSINGANDGISAPPLICATIONS.pdf
• File:07A70109-GROUND IMPROVEMENT TECHNIQUES.pdf
• File:07A70108-AIRPOLLUTIONANDCONTROL.pdf
• File:07A70106-TRAFFICENGINEERING.pdf
• File:07A70105-INDUSTRIALWASTEANDWASTEWATERMANAGEMENT.pdf
• File:07A70102-FINITE ELEMENT METHODS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING.pdf
• File:07A70104-EARTHQUAKERESISTANTDESIGN.pdf
• File:07A70103-ENVIRONMENTALENGINEERING-II.pdf
• File:Element ffnessMatrix 4-noded quadrilateral.pdf

Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:05, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:44, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No permission (most have watermark).

• File:文部科学省にて記者会見.JPG
• File:現地放射能調査.JPG
• File:マカオ総会2005.jpg
• File:黎教授.jpg
• File:2003年度 李函宓博士.jpg
• File:2003年度 関永康氏.jpg
• File:2003年度総会.jpg
• File:2001年度総会.jpg

Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:08, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:44, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:20, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Denniss (talk) 17:47, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:21, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Denniss (talk) 17:47, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

duplicate of File:HRO1237.jpg? McZusatz (talk) 19:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Denniss (talk) 17:45, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See also: [[::en:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 March 5#File:Exide Band Photograph 2012.jpg|

en:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 March 5#File:Exide Band Photograph 2012.jpg]].

Source: "I took this photograph using an olympus digital camera" but EXIF says that a Samsung camera was used. Stefan4 (talk) 21:19, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Also: "took by me on the 28th January 2012" in {{Information}} but "COPYRIGHT, 2010"+"Date and time of data generation: 2002-01-13T12:06:00" in EXIF. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:23, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Sourced here. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:31, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Denniss (talk) 17:45, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Probable copyright violation from Hoyo de Monterrey. This looks like a corporate advert (although I can't find an online source) and the EXIF suggests it is a scan. Not in use so should be deleted. QU ^TalkQu 10:49, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nominator. MBisanz ^talk 03:04, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded with wrong file name: Screenshot is of Knoppix, not Ubuntu. File superseded with upload of File:D.Iceweasel6.0.2 (nl) file action dialog--Knoppix6.7.1.png. -Mardus (talk) 02:55, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Compulsory response: I erroneously put "Ubuntu" into the image name, as the screenshot depicted downloading an Ubuntu .iso, and had the image uploaded with a bit of haste, not checking the target filename beforehand, since at that point I believed by default that the filename contained 'Knoppix' :\. After noticing the mistake, I reuploaded the same file with a new name. Also took the file nominated for deletion out of all non-hidden categories. -Mardus (talk) 03:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per the nominator. Mardus, you can use {{Bad name}} next time. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 10:31, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality image without any educational use. Might be copy vio, given the history of the uploader Hedwig in Washington ^(MAIL?) 08:00, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep -- Laberkiste (talk) 04:27, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The pic seems to represent driver Agustín Canapin, so it would be in scope if not for the fact it presents all usual traits of a taken-from-the-Web copyvio. Laberkiste, deletion requests aren't votes: you need to justify your position. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 10:26, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hotel_%E2%80%9CNadia%E2%80%9D.jpg Nadiaweb83 (talk) 09:14, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader's request with no reason given. Obviously this was uploaded for publicity reasons (uploader also created an article about the hotel on the Ukrainian WP, cf. uk:Надія (готель)). The pic is possibly out of scope. More important, the painting on the hotel may cross the threshold of originality; the fountain in the foreground certainly does and is too prominent to qualify as De minimis. There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 10:07, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The same representation of the coat of arms appears here so I guess that it is a copyvio, at least because of COM:COA#Coat of arms "found on the internet". Stefan4 (talk) 00:15, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. JuTa 06:12, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Complex logo so possibly copyvio, but the user name of the uploader suggests that it might have been an approved upload. Stefan4 (talk) 00:42, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: JuTa 06:13, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

attributed to manipal university (and super small compared to user's original contributions, suggesting not own work) - copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:47, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: cpvio JuTa 06:14, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The poster artwork is not of Australian origin, but from the U.S., and is still under copyright in US Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:47, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• From my understanding of the US copyright laws, it would still require a copyright notice (which it doesn't have). Also, the poster design itself may have been created by the company hired to do the lithograph; do you have access to the American poster (preferably of a high quality to check for copyright notices) for comparison? Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:10, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• The notion that the artwork for the poster of a major film release by a major studio with major stars (Lombard and Benny) would be left up to the printer is, please excuse me, entirely ludicrous.

  The copy of the US poster I have is not high enough resolution to see what it is, but there is text at the bottom of the poster, and, as artwork, all it would be required to have is the (c) symbol and the initials of the copyright holder, not a full "(c) Copyright 19xx by XXXX" as in books or films. Further, whether the Australian version does or doesn't have a copyright notice makes no difference to its copyright status in the US. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:16, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• The issue with "text at the bottom" is that it could also only be "Lithograph by ...", so it isn't very helpful. Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't the changes from the modification of the poster to fit Aussie laws (the triangle, for one) create a new copyright for the design, and therefore have to be registered simultaneously in the US to receive copyright protection? Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:58, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The text at the bottom says (some of it is not easily legible): "Lithographed and printed in Australia by Victory Publicity Pty. Ltd. Sydney / Melbourne." The movie itself is by United Artists. What "For General Exhibition" means is unclear. I am sure a real person also composed the artwork for the poster. -Mardus (talk) 02:33, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• In the above comment I was referring to the American poster, which I have yet to see a high-quality scan of. If the American poster 1) Used the same or similar design and 2) was published without a copyright notice, than this Aussie poster would be PD as well. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:37, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: we cannot be sure that its free JuTa 06:22, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not free - source ( http://nordiskungdom.se/omoss/identitet-och-grafiska-riktlinjer/ ) clearly states "Copyright 2009-2011 - Nordisk Ungdom. All rights reserved." I have tried to contact uploader at SVWP, but he is a fairly irregular visitor. Tournesol (talk) 06:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Does this logo meets the threshold of originality?

We could be in a PD-Textlogo case. --Dereckson (talk) 10:54, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not simple enough JuTa 06:24, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spam. Uploader got blocked on enwiki for spamming, advertising-only account. Hedwig in Washington ^(MAIL?) 07:57, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: its in use in multiple projects JuTa 06:27, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyvio. This image was posted to wowturkey.com on February 7, 2007 by telvin79. (The uploader User:Zinet became the user of Turkish Wikipedia on March 6, 2007). Takabeg (talk) 09:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. JuTa 06:29, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete, file replaced by file Rotational rheometers-Couette-Searle-Plate plate-Cone plate types Cjp24 (talk) 09:44, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: they are different. JuTa 06:31, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Couette rotational rheometer - Plate and plate - Cone and plate system.jpg

BadJPG, replaced by near-duplicate File:Couette rotational rheometer - Plate plate and cone plate systems.png, not used anywhere. Leyo 21:11, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. The image annotations should be copied to the PNG before deleting the JPEG, but otherwise it seems like the PNG is a perfect replacement and a definitive improvement of the JPEG. Now it just needs to be made into an SVG :) Prof. Professorson (talk) 15:19, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:20, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by redundant and much better, common and offical version File:Wappen_von_Ailertchen.png (also befor my upload, and also file type). Perhelion (talk) 10:23, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is an "web styled logo" version, not heraldic, for common(s) use out of scope. The origin version exist anyway in the history of the duplicate. -- πϵρήλιο ℗ 20:44, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: JuTa 06:32, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many copyvios uploaded by that user so can we trust own work here? I found no larger or older versions on the Internet so it could be own work. MGA73 (talk) 11:31, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: JuTa 06:40, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work, not sure this poster is released under a free license. Kiran Gopi (talk) 12:08, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: JuTa 06:41, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eliminated a dozen of times, please see eliminated contributions of user:Parque da Cachoeira. -- Yanguas (talk) 13:57, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: cpvio from i.e. http://0.static.wix.com/media/7d1c9f_d8b802d82679e0904e418f1e6ef1000f.jpg_1024 JuTa 06:45, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Missing important info. Which US federal employee went this close to him and shot his photo? Why didn't they arrest him? Officer (talk) 14:23, 5 March 2012 (UTC) The photo credit being to Dept of State does not imply a US federal employee, or even contractor, took the photo, it only implies the US Dept of State has the right to use the photo.[reply]

No US Federal Employee took this photograph. This image is a still from an interview Al Jazeera claims to have had with Sirajuddin Haqqani.

Deleted: JuTa 06:47, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In which country was this photo taken? I don't think that it is free unless 2D freedom of panorama applies. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:59, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: JuTa 06:49, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation: Publishing date is 1935. Being anonymous, it won't enter into the public domain until 2015. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ketamino (talk • contribs) 19:37, 4 March 2012‎ (UTC)[reply]

Kept: 1935+70=2005 JuTa 07:00, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation: Publishing date is 1934. Being anonymous, it won't enter into the public domain until 2014. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ketamino (talk • contribs) 19:33, 4 March 2012‎ (UTC)[reply]

Kept: 1934+70=2004 JuTa 07:03, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation: Publishing date is 1934. Being anonymous, it won't enter into the public domain until 2014. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ketamino (talk • contribs) 19:35, 4 March 2012‎ (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Indeed this is a copyvio; besides, a scan can't be considered as "own work". Fma12 (talk) 02:35, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: 1934+70=2004 JuTa 07:04, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation: Publishing date is 1953. Being anonymous, it won't enter into the public domain until 2033. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ketamino (talk • contribs) 19:39, 4 March 2012‎ (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: but undelete in 2024 JuTa 07:06, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: The only thing copyrightable here is the emblem/logo, and that is from 1897 and by Arturo Mélida (1849–1902), see [2]. --Rosenzweig τ 17:16, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Diese fehlerhafte Datei wurde ersetzt durch "Partition_coeff1.svg" Durfo (talk) 17:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: defect file. JuTa 07:08, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Diese fehlerhafte Datei wurde ersetzt durch "Partition_coeff2.svg" Durfo (talk) 17:57, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: defect file JuTa 07:09, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Logo of football team - taken from the site http://www.rfc-roermond.nl/ which has the (c) at the botton Miho (talk) 18:18, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: JuTa 07:10, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright? http://www.mip-online.com/multimedia/artikel/hoerproben/tanzende_gummistiefel_tanzanleitung_D.pdf?einzelpreis=0%2C50&kaufen=%A0%A0Kostenlose+Demoversion+%A0%A0 Svíčková (talk) 18:29, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: JuTa 07:11, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Linked image not found Magasjukur2 (talk) 19:53, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure the uploader has this file, and also he has uploaded a PNG version. It would be much better he could fix or upload the raw map. -- πϵρήλιο ℗ 20:27, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: defect file. JuTa 07:12, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete file, replaced by File:Rotational rheometers-Couette-Searle-Plate plate-Cone plate types.png Cjp24 (talk) 21:27, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: they are different. JuTa 07:13, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Earth in this file is extremely similar to an non-free file gods-plan-for-salvation-2.jpg form here. I doubt it is a derivative work for copyright file. Mys 721tx (talk) 21:37, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I did not realize that it comes from File:SunBurst10.PNG. Please close this request.-Mys 721tx (talk) 21:43, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The ticket queue is a bit slow. It was so slow, I uploaded them instead, even though I had attached the pics to the email. Penyulap (talk) 00:21, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: got a valid OTRS release JuTa 07:15, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This diagram shows a very similar copy of the image in the specified source of the similarity in my opinion is too large to be designated as a separate work. The creator can not publish this work freely, unless it is a work not worthy of protection. Cepheiden (talk) 21:41, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Technical diagrams can't have protectable individual creativity if these are redrawn. -- πϵρήλιο ℗ 11:34, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The diagramm was redrawn (incl. mirrored and colored) by Xavax (10:27, 7. March 2012 (UTC)) --Cepheiden (talk) 13:21, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I would not punish the author just because he referenced his work properly. I don't see threshold of originality in simple 2D technical drawings. Matt (talk) 17:53, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: but hided first 2 versions. JuTa 07:20, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot from commercial game MagnusA (talk) 21:55, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting to discuss if a result of a composition of objects that the user has produced could be treated as an image, created by hand and by the game user himself. I.e. compare to an image created by hand in msPaint or similar software.--Jonas Andréasson (talk) 09:21, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: JuTa 07:22, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot from commercial game. MagnusA (talk) 21:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is a photo showing how to build, i.e. this must be regarded as an example of how the game look like in comparison to different modes (i a series of three photos). The artistic value or the right can be discussed due to swedish law and be claimed as relevant. Compare with right to maps.--Jonas Andréasson (talk) 06:46, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: JuTa 07:22, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot from commercial game. MagnusA (talk) 21:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: JuTa 07:24, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

no stated source, tagged as PD-ineligible which is incorrect Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:44, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: JuTa 07:25, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]