Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Haiduc/Archive
Haiduc
- Haiduc (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date March 12 2010, 22:08 (UTC)
editSuspected sockpuppets
edit- Pdruknl (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Obvious not-new user shows up after having been slept for years and starts adding details on a famous persons pederasty? Quack?
Comments by accused parties
editSee Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
editClerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
edit- Checkuser request – code letter: A (Arbcom ban/sanction evasion )
- Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below. Requested by Hipocrite (talk) 22:08, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Clerk endorsed, this is unlikely to be a new user. Tim Song (talk) 06:03, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- Seems Unrelated to Haiduc, but Pdruknl does appear to be sharing a computer with other new users Willie2001 (talk · contribs) and Prince6309 (talk · contribs), and quite probably on proxies. Hersfold (t/a/c) 17:10, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
They're completely different edit patterns, and Prince6309 is completely inconclusive on behavior. No action taken at this time. –MuZemike 18:55, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
22 May 2010
editSuspected sockpuppets
edit- MelodiousEros (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Since creation of this account on April 14, this user has made a grand total of three edits (the other two edits on April 29 and May 11), all which were comments on my talk page requsting that I restore material that I deleted from a banned user (the suspected sock puppet). This account was created with the sole purpose of communicating with me under an identity I would not recognize.--Tonalone (talk) 04:42, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
editSee Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
editClerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
edit- Checkuser request – code letter: A (Arbcom ban/sanction evasion )
- Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below. Requested by Tonalone (talk) 04:42, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Clerk note: moved from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MelodiousEros, please see there for original history. SpitfireTally-ho! 17:08, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Checkuser note: Unrelated; they are from different continents. No other likely socks on the IP range. Risker (talk) 04:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |