Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Haiduc/Archive



Haiduc

Haiduc (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Report date March 12 2010, 22:08 (UTC)
edit
Suspected sockpuppets
edit


Evidence submitted by Hipocrite
edit

Obvious not-new user shows up after having been slept for years and starts adding details on a famous persons pederasty? Quack?


Comments by accused parties
edit

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
edit
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
edit
Checkuser request – code letter: A (Arbcom ban/sanction evasion )
Current status –   Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Hipocrite (talk) 22:08, 12 March 2010 (UTC) [reply]

  Clerk endorsed, this is unlikely to be a new user. Tim Song (talk) 06:03, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seems   Unrelated to Haiduc, but Pdruknl does appear to be sharing a computer with other new users Willie2001 (talk · contribs) and Prince6309 (talk · contribs), and quite probably on proxies. Hersfold (t/a/c) 17:10, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They're completely different edit patterns, and Prince6309 is completely inconclusive on behavior. No action taken at this time. –MuZemike 18:55, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

22 May 2010
edit
Suspected sockpuppets
edit


Evidence submitted by Tonalone
edit

Since creation of this account on April 14, this user has made a grand total of three edits (the other two edits on April 29 and May 11), all which were comments on my talk page requsting that I restore material that I deleted from a banned user (the suspected sock puppet). This account was created with the sole purpose of communicating with me under an identity I would not recognize.--Tonalone (talk) 04:42, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties
edit

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
edit
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
edit
Checkuser request – code letter: A (Arbcom ban/sanction evasion )
Current status –   Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Tonalone (talk) 04:42, 22 May 2010 (UTC) [reply]

  Clerk note: moved from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MelodiousEros, please see there for original history. SpitfireTally-ho! 17:08, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser note:   Unrelated; they are from different continents. No other likely socks on the IP range. Risker (talk) 04:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


  This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.