Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Disambiguations

Socialist Party (India) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I strongly doubt "Indian political parties named Socialist Party" is a notable list topic per WP:NLIST. I propose turning this article into a disambiguation page. Sourced claims that are present here should be moved to applicable articles. Janhrach (talk) 16:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, Disambiguations, Lists, and India. Janhrach (talk) 16:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - but assign to the original Socialist Party. The first SP (the 1951 one) was a major national party, was the largest opposition party in national parliament at some point. The article should be delimited to that party. --Soman (talk) 21:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Soman: Do you mean the one that "won only 12 seats at the 1951 Indian general election". Is that sentence from the article accurate? Janhrach (talk) 12:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  See [1]. The wording "only 12 seats" is a bit odd, as 12 seats in national election is hardly a minor feat. The party was the third largest in the first election, winning 12 seats, with 11,216,719 votes (10.59%). Clearly the original SP is the primary topic here. --Soman (talk) 16:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks for the clarification. Indeed, now I see that coming third in the election is a major event, and so I support the notion of SP being the primary topic here. Janhrach (talk) 17:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep but change. I can see several ways what to do with this: (1) Redirecting this to List of socialist parties#India is better than turning this into a dab page (because of WP:INCDAB) or set index page (the parties are not truly named the same thing), and takes care of OR and N. (2) Rename it to something like Socialist parties in India or Socialist politics in India and refocus, similar to how the two interwikis (de, bn) have done. The point appears to be that Indian socialists have (under different names) been trying to gain hold in the political arena for decades and failed. That might be an overarching notable topic. – sgeureka ^t•c 08:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Socialism in India already exists. Thanks for the other suggestions, particluraly for mentioning INCDAB, which I did not know about. As for the suggestion to remodel the article like the dewiki one, I think making the result part of the aforementioned Socialism in India is preferable to keeping it a separate article, mainly in the light of that article not mentioning the events described in Socialist party (India). Janhrach (talk) 12:39, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  German wiki article says clearly that the party existed 1948-1952. --Soman (talk) 16:24, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The lead of the German article is weird; the rest of the article is similar in scope to the one we are discussing. (The framing is, however, different: the enwiki article looks like a list, but the German one is more focused on chronological description of the events related to the parties.) Janhrach (talk) 17:31, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• To further complicate things: the 1948-1952 Socialist Party is essentially the same party as the Congress Socialist Party. I'll try to work on a draft to improve an article on 1948-1952 SP provisionally, but eventually there should be a merge between CSP and SP articles. --Soman (talk) 14:09, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT in Poland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to LGBT history in Poland per wp:2DABS following Israel case, unless categories count? See also these redirect and RM discussions. --MikutoH ^talk! 22:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender, Disambiguations, and Poland. --MikutoH ^talk! 22:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to LGBT rights in Poland. Sampling other countries for "LGBT in [country]", they always seem to redirect to the respective country's "LGBT rights in [country]" article. The See also section can/will take care of the history aspect, if the article body doesn't. – sgeureka ^t•c 08:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Park Sung-hoon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:PRIMARYRED, unnecessary disambiguation page as only one other article currently exists for this name, Park Sung-hoon (actor). Other person named Park Sunghoon is located at Sunghoon per his WP:COMMONNAME.

Disambiguation page should be deleted and Park Sung-hoon (actor) should be moved into its place at Park Sung-hoon. RachelTensions (talk) 03:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. RachelTensions (talk) 03:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Also note that a hatnote already exists at Park Sung-hoon (actor) directing people looking for the singer of the same name to Sunghoon. RachelTensions (talk) 03:40, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Disambiguations, and South Korea. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dog poop (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unnecessary disambiguation page. Walsh90210 (talk) 20:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Walsh90210 (talk) 20:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or redirect to Dog shit, which could have a {{lookfrom|Dog poop}} at the bottom. – sgeureka ^t•c 21:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saer Sene (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Middle names don't count, so only there's only one entry. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Saër Sène per nom. – sgeureka ^t•c 17:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cannon (comics) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Barely one legit entry, if that. No mention of Cannon in WildStorm article. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:34, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation, Disambiguations, and Lists. jlwoodwa (talk) 00:01, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Cannon (disambiguation)#Other arts and entertainment. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Since there's only one comics entry there (the semi-valid entry here), why not redirect to that article directly? Clarityfiend (talk) 22:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Heroes, Inc. Presents Cannon. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect as proposed. Raymond3023 (talk) 03:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Heroes, Inc. Presents Cannon. – sgeureka ^t•c 17:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as we have two different Redirect target articles suggested.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:17, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yellow Line (New York) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally a redirect to BMT Broadway Line, this page got turned into an incomplete disambiguation page (WP:INCDAB) listing two more New Yorker yellow lines that neither mention "yellow" in the article body nor are listed on the Yellow Line dab page (i.e. unlikely search target?). Since INCDAB pages aren't ideal, I see the following solutions for this particular page:

1. Upmerge all entries to Yellow Line and redirect to Yellow Line {{R from incomplete disambiguation}}
2. Redirect back to the original BMT Broadway Line target, maybe add hatnotes
3. Delete to avoid confusion over dab-worthiness
4. Keep and accept this INCDAB

Whatever the result, I'd do the same for the 6 other NY color line INCDABs (not part of this AFD). – sgeureka ^t•c 14:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ETA: Page/Redirect were originally created by now-blocked editor, see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive357#Dozens_upon_dozens_of_questionable_redirects_created_by_now-blocked_user. – sgeureka ^t•c 13:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation, Disambiguations, and New York. – sgeureka ^t•c 14:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as none of the entries on the page are actually "yellow lines"; the only commonality between them is that their emblem is colored yellow. (I would also !vote to delete the other incomplete disambiguations, but they weren't nominated here.) – Epicgenius (talk) 13:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 18:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Left-wing coalition (Italy) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A very weird incomplete disambiguation page (WP:INCDAB). (1) There is no general/international Left-wing coalition dab page where this could be merged, and I can't find other WP pages listing left-wing coalitions. (2) Maybe there is potential for a WP:BROADCONCEPT article like Left-wing politics in Croatia, but the notability of the topic is unclear: There is no interwiki link (including Italian); List of political parties in Italy mentions "left-wing" once, and List of political coalitions in Italy none. So: Should this page even exist? – sgeureka ^t•c 12:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Disambiguations. – sgeureka ^t•c 12:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:09, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did not technically "create" the article, it was created [2] by @Nick.mon: when there was a coalition of left-wing parties in Sicily which eventually became Free and Equal (Italy) and thus redirected there. It wasn't accurate since there are/were other coalitions before and after. I wouldn't mind a WP:BROADCONCEPT article or maybe something like Centre-right coalition (Italy) (the latter would have the problem that multiple coalition compete, in 2018 there were three coalitions) Braganza (talk) 12:21, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fitzhugh Lee (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TWODABS applies. The only legit entries are the general and the vice admiral. Middle names, Fitz Lee (Medal of Honor) and Lee Fitzhugh don't count. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:59, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep (just) There are a lot of partial matches, and the see also section may be WP:USEFUL to readers, as well as the 3 entries that are fully valid as this appears to be a dab for Fitzes and Fitzhughes. Not the most important page, but potentially helpful to readers, and nothing to be gained by deletion. Boleyn (talk) 12:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and possibly add the anthroponymy project to the talk page. Lightburst (talk) 00:46, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:50, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. There are only two entries here (there's no evidence Fitz Lee (Medal of Honor) was "Fitzhugh"), so WP:TWODABS applies and this page could and should be deleted. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:34, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Disambiguation/Article alerts, a bot-maintained listing of a variety of changes affecting disambiguation pages including deletion discussions