Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 September 30

< September 29	October 1 >

September 30

File:Mattcasselvikings.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mattcasselvikings.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

EXIF data credits photo to "Pioneer Press: Scott Takushi" Eeekster (talk) 00:32, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Martha Roby Official.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:14, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Martha Roby Official.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

EXIF data states: "These images are copyright protected©2011 Shealah Craighead Photography. " Eeekster (talk) 00:51, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment wouldn't the official portrait be work-for-hire, and thus the EXIF statement would be wrong? -- 65.92.181.39 (talk) 06:18, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That might be the case. But it would really depend on the contract and we have no way to know and even if it is work-for-hire, that doesn't make it a work of a US Government employee so the copyright exception doesn't hold. Eeekster (talk) 02:35, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Dixon - History of Horror.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dixon - History of Horror.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Uploader claims to be the copyright holder, though it's clearly a derivative work of "Skull II" by noted artist John Sumrow. No evidence of permission/copyright transfer from Sumrow. Psychonaut (talk) 09:57, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Daniel Sheehan Sara Nelson Silkwood Verdict.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: All imges in this group have been deleted. Diannaa (talk) 00:33, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daniel Sheehan Sara Nelson Silkwood Verdict.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No successful OTRS review, see ticket 2013082810015278. The copyright appears to be held by United Press International and a release would be required from the original press photographer or their agent.

Please consider images which also were not successful at OTRS covered by this discussion:

File:Silkwoods win case headline.png - a similar issue with a newspaper scan.
File:Greensboro justic has not been done headline.jpg - another newspaper scan.
File:Inside the shadow government book cover.jpg - a book cover with multiple authors credited. Fæ (talk) 11:34, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ellorasachin 03.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ellorasachin 03.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ellora03-sachin.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 13:19, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Dasi aparanji.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept as fair use for one article. Diannaa (talk) 04:38, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dasi aparanji.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Unfortunately not in the public domain in the United States, per Wikipedia:Non-U.S. copyrights#Four-point test. This entered the public domain in India a few years after 1996, so URAA makes it copyrighted in USA for 95 years from publication. Stefan2 (talk) 13:28, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But it satisfies the Indian public domain criteria, even the owner (S. S. Vasan) died in 1969. Then why call it non-free? ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 13:35, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't seem to satisfy the Indian public domain criteria as the author died less than 60 years ago. In either case, Wikipedia is hosted in the United States, which means that Wikipedia follows the United States copyright rules. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:57, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To avoid further issues, can we keep the image with a different licensing? ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 05:25, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a film poster user in an article about the film. Such posters typically satisfy WP:NFCI §1. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:59, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, to conclude it, I'll change the licensing. That should solve it all. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 07:34, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Miss Goh YiLing(Miss Personality 2012, Miss Universe Singapore 2012) (1st Runner up, Miss S ingapore Chinatown 2012).jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miss Goh YiLing(Miss Personality 2012, Miss Universe Singapore 2012) (1st Runner up, Miss S ingapore Chinatown 2012).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Obviously from a photoshoot. Dubious copyright. Most edits by the user have more or less been disruptive. Nymf (talk) 18:00, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Garayev Piano.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Converted to fair use. Diannaa (talk) 00:48, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Garayev Piano.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

blatant copyright violation, no permission provided Երևանցի ^talk 22:49, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.