Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXLJ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ultrasonic Broadcasting System. (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī ^(talk) 06:05, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DXLJ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could be a redirect, but does not meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:51, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:55, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:55, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: NMEDIA, whether Onel5969 likes this or not, covers this, as does GNG. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 19:25, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This fails GNG on its face - none of the references are all of significant, independent, and reliable. NMEDIA doesn't matter if GNG isn't met. SportingFlyer T·C 14:59, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• The source presented below which "demonstrates a WP:GNG pass" is a trivial mention in a six-sentence article about something completely different. The article does not yet pass GNG. SportingFlyer T·C 13:15, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Sources 1 and 2 state that the station is licensed by the NTC. Source 3 indicates part of the station's programming. That said, the article is good enough to pass both WP:NMEDIA and WP:GNG. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • If anyone is thinking of arguing with me over my views, don't bother responding. I'm not gonna waste my time on arguing. My keep stands. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Superastig: I'm not sure that's what you want to say; a self-confessed WP:ICANTHEARYOU will be a slam-dunk T-ban at ANI...

• Redirect to Ultrasonic Broadcasting System as an alternative to deletion, per WP:CHEAP, WP:PRESERVE, etc. NMEDIA is not a community-endorsed guideline, and so rationales relying it are not policy-based, as several closers have concluded. The coverage is woefully inadequate for GNG purposes, consisting entirely of trivial or even unrelated coverage. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:25, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per WP:ATD-R, and if necessary protect the redirect if there's uany attempt to circumvent this process by a subsequrnt recreation. Redirects themselves don't have to pass GNG, so that's not an issue; they just have to be a reasonable search term. But the sourcing here is woefully inadequate for a stand alone article. ——Serial 11:33, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Meets WP:BCASTOUTCOMES and WP:GNG per Astig's and Neutralhomer's argument. SBKSPP (talk) 00:29, 26 June 2021 (UTC)— Note to closing admin: SBKSPP (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. [reply]
• Comment - simply saying something passes GNG, when it clearly doesn't, is not really a good way to win folks over to your side. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:16, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Ultrasonic Broadcasting System. The station doesn't yet meet the GNG, and this is an accepted ATD. I've tried to stay off the bench in these radio station topics (given that I'm one of the primary promoters of a rewrite of NMEDIA and these AfDs are part of that story), but as it is at least already clear that any SNG version of NMEDIA will be fundamentally aligned with the GNG, we can use that for now. There is no significant coverage at all. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:24, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.