23

In his January 1984 Editorial in Asimov’s, the eponymous editorial director asks

The early pulps occasionally made use of "house names.” A particular magazine would use a pseudonym that was never used except in that magazine, but that pseudonym might be used by any number of different writers. I have never really understood why this was done and if any reader knows I would appreciate being told.

This seems like a significant question of sf history, and I am surprised there isn’t a ready internet answer, forty years after it was posed by the Good Doctor. Is there historical evidence as to why such a practice was used?

New contributor
forty-year-old-question is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
3
  • Maybe it was just easier to reuse the same house names instead of inventing new ones for every issue? I wonder how many readers even paid attention to the authors' names? I'm pretty sure I didn't whan I was reading those pulps back in the 1940s.
    – user14111
    Commented yesterday
  • 2
    If you don't have any recognisable names, than make one! It also looks like a brand of a product, which they were.
    – Mithoron
    Commented yesterday
  • 1
    There is also the reason to "Hide" the name of the real author. Those who might not want it known they are writing in that genre. Or only wrote in a genre for a paycheck, while working on their slowly progressing "Next Novel". The "adult sleaze" pulp books of the 50s, 60s & 70s? are a perfect example. MANY well known authors wrote books in this genre and used "house" names to hide there involvement, not wanting the public to know they were writing what was essential at the time porn novels (although quite tame by todays standards).
    – NJohnny
    Commented 19 hours ago

1 Answer 1

28

I think the answer is simply that the house name gives the impression that the quality of all the stories in any particular issue will be the same as the quality of the stories in any other issue. Pulps were sold as a commodity ("Contains an entire short novel!" "160 pages of thrills," etc.), so anything that suggested variability (like different authors this month) was perceived as a negative. It's also likely that publishing houses wished to make authors disposable - and the way to do that is to make sure that if "Joe Smith" (writing under the house name of "Richard Hardjaw") demanded a raise or became otherwise a problem, "John Doe" could slip into the job of being "Richard Hardjaw" without the customers having a moment of doubt.

This article on the subject confirms the second reason:

In the pulps, I’m not sure when they started to be used, but the first I knew of its use is with “Maxwell Grant” as the author of The Shadow, rather than credit Walter B. Gibson. Interestingly, Gibson created that name, using the names of two magic dealers. When you keep in mind that The Shadow, like the previous dime novel characters, was owned by the publisher, this is why. This was different from the many previous serialized characters that were owned by the authors, as well as you now had a magazine focused on and named for the character.

Hence the main reason for the use of house names was that should there need to be a new author to write the character, this can be hidden under the house name, and so most, but certainly not all, of the character pulps to follow did this. Making it more tricky is when these house names would be used for other characters, or would be used by the publisher for more wider use.

I should also note that house names were and are common in markets that appeal to the same folks expected to read the pulps - like "Franklin Dixon" for The Hardy Boys, "Carolyn Keane" for Nancy Drew and "Ellery Queen" for the Ellery Queen books.

12
  • 2
    Thank you for your prompt answer! ( I will accept and upvote when my new account allows). The practice seems shortsighted to modern eyes, since sophisticated readers would notice the differences in quality and style from ‘house names’ but, on the other hand, early pulp readers aged 10 might not have caught this! Commented yesterday
  • 6
    It still happens today. "Erin Hunter" of the Warrior Cats books is half a dozen different authors. They apparently chose the surname because it would get them put next to Brian Jacques's Redwall series in libraries and bookshops.
    – Withad
    Commented yesterday
  • 11
    Richard Hardjaw is an amazing name. I can't believe this reply is the only instance of that name on the internent.
    – kutuzof
    Commented yesterday
  • 4
    @forty-year-old-question "quality" and "style" aren't necessarily words one attributes to pulps. Or at least wasn't what the publishers were going for. ("Available at most corner stores, for only one dollar!" was more the goal.)
    – R.M.
    Commented yesterday
  • 3
    By the way @forty-year-old-question, please come back with more questions, even if they are only 35 years old
    – Andrew
    Commented 17 hours ago

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.